So What Do You Do, Deborah Norville, Inside Edition Anchor, Bestselling Author?
A 30-year TV vet and NYT bestselling author talks balancing her life and staying positive
December 5, 2007
Deborah Norville is first and foremost a survivor. The broadcast veteran -- who is celebrating her 30th year in the business next month -- endured one of the most brutal cases of career- and character-bashing ever inflicted on a television personality in the nineties but emerged stronger for it. It might seem like ancient history when the arrival of the younger, blonder Norville on the Today show couch in 1990 was characterized as 'the other woman' breaking up the television marriage of Jane Pauley and Bryant Gumbel, but the memory remains vivid for Norville. While the press had a field day painting the 29-year-old Norville as Eve Harrington to Pauley's Margo Channing, the much vilified anchor was told by the powers that be at NBC to hold her tongue. While on maternity leave the following year, Norville dutifully kept silent about the controversy in an interview with People and was photographed breast feeding her son. The photographs allegedly angered NBC executives, and it was announced in April 1991 that Norville would not be returning to Studio 1A. Her replacement: Katie Couric. Today, the resolutely outspoken broadcaster/author makes sure she's heard whenever she has something to say. These days, Norville is talking a great deal about her latest book, Thank You Power, which cracked the New York Times How-to/Advice best seller list. Going beyond the current crop of touchy-feely you-can-do-it books like The Secret, Norville uses scientific evidence to show the positive effect gratitude can actually have on one's life, health, and wealth. It's certainly worked for her.
Name: Deborah Norville Position: Anchor, Inside Edition; author, Thank You Power: Making the Science of Gratitude Work For You. Resume: Prior to joining Inside Edition in 1995, worked at CBS as anchor of America Tonight and correspondent for 48 Hours and The CBS Evening News. Launched nationally syndicated Deborah Norville Radio Show on ABC News Radio Network in September 1992; hosted for one year. Named co-host of Today in January 1990 after serving as the show's news reader and a stint as anchor of the network's NBC News at Sunrise. Left Today on maternity leave in February 1991. Briefly anchored Deborah Norville Tonight on MSNBC while simultaneously hosting Inside Edition. Started her television career while still in college as a reporter and weekend anchor for WAGA-TV in Atlanta, Georgia. Author of several books. Birthdate: August 8, 1958 Hometown: Dalton, Georgia ("The carpet capital of the world. We make enough carpeting on an annual basis to pave a six-lane highway around the Equator!") Education: University of Georgia Marital status: Married to Karl Wellner; three children. First section of the Sunday Times: "I usually get The Week in Review because my husband stole the Style Section. [Laughs] I glance at the front page but then I go for Week in Review because I feel if I read that, I've accomplished something." Favorite television show: "My husband and I like Brothers & Sisters right now. On the surface one would think, 'This isn't real life.' The reality is, oh yes it is. Get five families together and chances are every scenario that's been depicted on this show will be present in one of five families. You won't find them all in one family, that part is a bit unrealistic. But they do have Sally Field as their mother so if that were the case, maybe you would. The acting is fantastic and you don't see a lot of great acting all that often." Guilty pleasure: "Potato chips and milk." Last book read: "I'm one of those people where the most recent is always my favorite. Right now I'm working on a book called Richistan by a Wall Street Journal reporter [Robert Frank]. The book is not new. It was on my husband's table and I stole it when he finished it.
Next month will mark your 30th anniversary in broadcasting. How would you say you've gotten to where you are? A lot of hard work. An inability to be personally satisfied with my own effort. I would say also unquenchable curiosity.
What the secret to your longevity?
Really? Did you think that was a good idea? I thought it was insane. I said to my agent at time, "This is crazy. How can you tell someone who is in the press to maintain a 'no comment' stance?" He said, "First of all, you're talking about network brass." [Laughs] Secondly, he said, "You've been given a direct order, and if you now take action contrary to what they've ordered you not to do, they could hold you in breach." So now it's turned into a legal thing. If I had opened my mouth and done what my instincts were -- which was to tell my side of the story and explain all the answers to the questions that were going unanswered by anyone -- at the very least my version of events would have been out there. Say what you want about me, but Norville speaks the truth. More importantly, I would have at least felt like hey, at least I defended myself. Que sera, sera. What happens, happens, but I did what I could.
How did you deal with the pressure? The reason the sewing machine worked for me was because I was still showing up for work every day. Heck, I won an Emmy while all the craziness was going on! It certainly wasn't that I wasn't well-equipped for the job. It was obviously political stuff -- I was younger and blonder than Jane Pauley. But the sewing helped me, because while I was going to my job day in and day out, there wasn't a whole lot of fulfillment. I could pull out the sewing machine -- at the time I was expecting a child and decorating the baby's nursery -- and I could work on the window shades or crib bumper. I could finish it and put it up and feel really good about it. There was a sense of satisfaction. That was the one thing they weren't saying -- "She's a lousy seamstress."
I did some research into what was being written about you during that time and was shocked to find a piece in The New York Times by Walter Goodman, which ran on January 9, 1990. He wrote: "For any viewer who might find Ms. Norville's good looks a bit too much so early in the day, her style is reassuringly down to earth." He also called you a "blonde glamour puss" in the piece. How does such blatant sexism look in your rear view mirror now?
It was the 1990s, not the sixties...
When we talked about Katie Couric's public relations nightmare at the CBS Evening News a few weeks back, it occurred to me that women who come out of morning television, regardless of what they go on to do, are narrowly defined by that role, and yet the men that start out the same way are not. Is that ever going to change?
Let's talk about Inside Edition. You've been there for almost 13 years. That's a long time to be with one show. Why have you stayed? I had a very clear wake up call when I was at CBS, which is where I was before I came here. At CBS, I was so grateful to be at the network doing stories that were substantive and meaningful -- that was the heyday of network news magazines. There were 13 of them on the air at the time, but it was quality television. There was one story that I did about a woman from Oklahoma City who had kidnapped back her child who had been taken in violation of a custody order by her Tunisian-born husband. It was like that old Sally Field Not Without My Daughter movie. We had done a profile on them and had been there with the commandos when they did this whole cloak and dagger undercover thing and literally outran the Tunisian border patrol on a speed boat in the Mediterranean Sea. Talk about jaw dropping suspense. Yet, here I was on this tiny island, where a woman has literally spent her last five dollars to be reunited with her child, and I'm willing to leave mine five thousand miles behind. It didn't compute. As I saw this woman hug her son, I thought, "I can't do this anymore." That was when I started thinking, "When this contract comes to a conclusion, I would like to continue doing [television] magazine reporting, but I need to be based [in New York]." There weren't any anchor opportunities for me. If you're an anchor, it really is a ball and chain around your foot. If you're desperate to be home with your family, it's a welcome ball and chain. I was looking for a ball and chain, and there was none to be had at CBS. They could give me the Sunday night anchor job, and the rest of the time I was going to be on plane. I couldn't do that. At a certain point, for me anyway -- I don't say this in judgment of anyone else's choices -- I had to subjugate my own wishes, desires and passion to run around the world and do cool stories to take care of the important assignment, which was the family. I don't want to get into the Mommy Track argument. It was what I needed to do. It was right for me and for my family. It's funny, when I made that choice and the job at Inside Edition came up, the same Pulitzer-prize winner who called me "scheming and conniving and hungry as a shark" also opined that I had traded my credibility. I responded back. No longer under a gag order, the one promise I made to myself when I did get back on track was that I would never let them --- defined as those nitwits in broadcasting --- have control over my life again. At the same time, I also said I will respond as I think best to any issues that may arise in the press. So, to that I responded, "I never knew that my credibility had anything to do with the eyeball or the peacock on my paycheck." Mr. Pulitzer-prize winner had nothing more to say. From that moment on -- really when I came back to television at CBS -- I've always let the PR people at the stations, the networks or whatever know: "Great to work with you. We're going to have a good time, but you need to know, I've been done in by others in your business before and it won't happen twice. I'll certainly let you know any time I'm doing anything, but I won't be coming to you for permission." Knock on wood as I say this, I think I've been blessed with some fairly decent press because I'm a straight talker. The image that was made of me was of someone who was somehow devious and underhanded. I understand in a vacuum people create facts to fill the space. I now make sure there's no vacuum by being accessible.
Have you always been someone who looked for the silver lining or did you develop that ability as a defense mechanism to help cope with what you've gone through?
Was that an impetus for Thank You Power? How did that come about? That's when I went down the avenue on positive affect --- that your cognitive thinking can be improved, and then it was wow, that's really neat. You can actually influence your body's response to stress. You can actually lower your blood pressure. This is unbelievable. Did you ever see that movie A Beautiful Mind with Russell Crowe? Remember when he was flipping out and you could see those numbers and things would appear? It was exactly that way -- all this disparate data and all these really cool surveys -- and suddenly I just saw these lines which were not tangential that definitely connected this to this to that. I thought, "I'm going to weave something together and I think it's going to be good." It was definitely not hard labor to do this. I pulled a couple of all-nighters -- and that's because I tend to let deadlines get way too close. I think that's a hallmark of people who are directed and focused -- sometimes you need the pressure of a deadline.
Your show covers the requisite celebrity stories. Which celebrities do you find fascinating and which ones need to go away come 2008? As much as we lament the state of affairs that has created the news stories of the pop princesses, we cover them. We facilitate those stories and we make those people celebrities. What would happen if we didn't show? I cannot speak for my producers -- this is me personally saying this -- but I suspect if I were to go to my boss and say, "How about we declare a moratorium on all those kinds of stories?" He would shake his head and say, "You don't understand. The competition is going to cover it and the viewers want it." You can always point the finger in another direction rather than look in the mirror. We've created these people. No one would know who Paris Hilton is, was or will be if the first photographer hadn't taken a picture of her. We created them. [Whispers] We can make them go away, too. But we won't. [Laughs]
You talked earlier about making career decisions based on what was best for your family. Inevitably, whenever I talk to a woman with children for this column, the conversation turns to the juggling act that is working motherhood. How do you do it? When they were really small, I was very lucky. I had incredible reliable babysitters or nannies or a combination of all of the above, so I was able to patchwork something together. But I have to say it wasn't without an unbelievable amount of stress. When they were little there wasn't a business trip I didn't go on where I didn't worry. I killed myself. When I was still at CBS the note fairy would leave notes for every single day I'd be gone. When I was on an international trip, my phone bills were outrageous because I would fax letters with little mommy pictures so there would be something every day for my son. I remember standing at the phone bank at San Francisco International Airport at 4 o'clock California time saying, "Now I lay me down to sleep..." It was time for prayers back in New York, and a woman who was dressed like me in a business suit with her rollaway bag next to her overheard me and she burst into tears. And I thought, "You know what, she's right. This is hideous." That's why I made the choice I made. It is the woman who makes the choices, and I think we're able to do it with a gladness of heart that our husbands, the fathers of our children, would not be able to do. That's my observation from having lived this mommy life for 16 years.
You wrote extensively about suffering from depression in a previous book. Is that something in your research you've found an endemic to women in today's society where the pressure to "do it all" and "have it all" is so great?
What would you consider your greatest success?
That's a very popular answer, actually.
What about your biggest disappointment?
Diane Clehane is a contributing editor to FishbowlNY and TVNewser. She writes the Lunch at Michael's column. [This article has been edited for length and clarity.] |
|
| > Have a comment? Send a letter to the editor. > Read more in our archives |
Deborah Norville is first and foremost a survivor. The broadcast veteran -- who is celebrating her 30th year in the business next month -- endured one of the most brutal cases of career- and character-bashing ever inflicted on a television personality in the nineties but emerged stronger for it. It might seem like ancient history when the arrival of the younger, blonder Norville on the Today show couch in 1990 was characterized as 'the other woman' breaking up the television marriage of Jane Pauley and Bryant Gumbel, but the memory remains vivid for Norville. While the press had a field day painting the 29-year-old Norville as Eve Harrington to Pauley's Margo Channing, the much vilified anchor was told by the powers that be at NBC to hold her tongue. While on maternity leave the following year, Norville dutifully kept silent about the controversy in an interview with People and was photographed breast feeding her son. The photographs allegedly angered NBC executives, and it was announced in April 1991 that Norville would not be returning to Studio 1A. Her replacement: Katie Couric. 



