J-School Confidential: The Great MA/MS Debate
PhD-level reading has one MA student wondering if she should have chosen Columbia's MS path instead
December 14, 2007
Three years ago, Columbia unveiled its new MA in journalism. Unlike the famous MS program, which taught fledgling newsmongers the ins and outs of reporting, the MA targeted experienced journalists, and sought to give them a broader understanding of arts, science, business, or political theory. As one of the deans once put it, the MS program is for brain surgeons who want to get in to journalism; the MA is for journalists who want to write about brain surgery.Having already spent four years working in magazines, the idea of the MA appealed to me. I wanted to switch gears in my career: less abs and more art; less olive oil and more cultural criticism from a feminist perspective. Enrolling in the MS -- which many of my friends had done a good four years ago, right after college -- seemed like a step back. Plus, the deadline to apply for the MA was a full month later than the deadline for the MS, which appealed to me even more. Now I'm almost halfway through my program and wondering if I made the right choice. It's too soon to come to any conclusion, and since I'm fully invested in the MA, I'm determined to take advantage of every available opportunity it presents and create some of my own along the way. But the application deadlines are coming soon for any aspiring j-school students, so for those trying to make a similar decision, keep the following in mind:
How much do you want to write?
How much do you want to read?
How deeply do you care about your subject matter? How much fun do you want to have? "You will have a blast!" promised all my MS-alum friends. And from what I can tell, the MS class is having a blast. They're working hard, but they're simulating newsroom conditions, which means big bursts of work, followed by lots of drinking. The MA is more of a long, slow grind, with fewer of the mini-deadlines to break things up (and around which to get drunk). And since the demo is a little older and a little more settled, they're less likely to hit happy hour at the end of the week. Most of us are taking time off from our jobs -- escaping from the real world for a year, instead of postponing our entry into it -- so there's more of a sense of urgency and seriousness than those devil-may-care MS kids. It's possible that I'm just a loser -- there's an MA happy hour ever week, and when I ventured out to the last one I had a blast. But it does seem that we're not drinking nearly as much as my friends who graduated in '02 -- though maybe they just an especially soused bunch. Of course, all this is just my opinion -- for some people, this MA is exactly what they wanted. For others, it's a disaster. As for me, I'm learning a lot from some of my classes, and less from others, and I won't know for sure if I made the right decision about which program I chose until this summer -- you know, when I do or don't land one of those illusive, high-paying, high-status journalism jobs. It is good to be back in academia, talking with smart people about interesting things, rather than being stuck in Pennsylvania writing about sex yoga. No matter what happens in June, I still have six more months of that.
|
||
| > Have a comment? Send a letter to the editor. > Read more in our archives |
Three years ago, Columbia unveiled its new MA in journalism. Unlike the famous MS program, which taught fledgling newsmongers the ins and outs of reporting, the MA targeted experienced journalists, and sought to give them a broader understanding of arts, science, business, or political theory. As one of the deans once put it, the MS program is for brain surgeons who want to get in to journalism; the MA is for journalists who want to write about brain surgery.
Kate Dailey is a Gordon Grey Fellow at Columbia University




